Page 37 - 2020 Yılında Diyarbakır Barosu Başkanı, Yönetim Kurulu ve Baro Üyesi Avukatlara Yönelik Soruşturma ve Kovuşturmalara Dair Rapor
P. 37

DIY
                                DIYARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATIONARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATION
 DIYARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATIONARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATION  DIY
 L
 LAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTERAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTER  L LAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTERAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTER
 of  being  a member  of  the organization. We would like to  point out  that  in   WEBSITE LINKS/ FOOTNOTES
 many cases within the scope of Article 314 of the Turkish Penal Code, the same   1.   https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/tahir-elciyi-aldiginiz-yerdeyiz
 procedure  is  followed  at  the  national  level,  and  this  broad  interpretation  is
 against the ‘prescribed by law’ criterion. The current implementation of Article   2.   https://www.evrensel.net/haber/355300/soylunun-tehditleri-son-bulmuyor-baro-
                hakkinda-geregini-yapacagiz
 314 of the Turkish Penal Code at the national level poses a serious threat to
 freedom of expression.  3.   https://www.evrensel.net/haber/355300/soylunun-tehditleri-son-bulmuyor-baro-
                hakkinda-geregini-yapacagiz
 7.  In  all  other  investigations  conducted  under  the  Anti  Terror  Law  (Including   4.   https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/soylunun-hedef-aldigi-diyarbakir-barosundan-
 investigations against lawyers), lawyers are routinely restricted from examining   aciklama-1569212
 and  taking  samples  under  Article  153  of  the  Criminal  Court  Law.  In  all   5.   https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/amp/haber/tahir-elci-kimdir-435291
 investigation files in which our colleagues were tried in the court, a restriction   6.   https://www.evrensel.net/haber/416967/tahir-elci-davasinda-avukatlar-reddihakim-
 decision was taken with the request of the Prosecutor’s Office and the decision   talebinde-bulundu
 of  the  Criminal  Judge  of  Peace.  Restriction  decisions  are  made  with  ‘cliche’
 justifications  by  repeating  the  law  article  without  any  concrete  justification.   7.   https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/gundem/2020/03/12/diyarbakir-ve-urfada-9-avukat-
                gozaltina-alindi
 Objections  to  restriction  decisions  are  often  left  unanswered  or  rejected  on
 ‘cliche’ grounds. This rule, which the law provides as an exception, has become   8.   https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/avukatlar-bir-kez-daha-saldiri-altinda
 a general rule especially in crimes within the scope of the Turkish Civil Code. The   9.   https://tr.sputniknews.com/turkiye/202011201043258958-diyarbakir-24-avukat-72-
 suspiciousness of the evidence and the concealment of the evidence from the   gozalti-101-kisi-hakkinda-gozalti-karari-var/
 attorneys, seriously threatens the ‘equality of arms’, ‘freedom and security of the   10.  https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/diyarbakir-barosu-eski-baskani-aktara-hapis-cezasi-
 person’ and the ‘right to a fair trial’.  haber-1510262
            11.  https://anayasagundemi.com/2020/12/28/iham-buyuk-dairesinin-selahattin-demirtas-
 8.  In operations against lawyers as well as in operations against citizens, the Criminal   no-kararinin-cevirisi-hdp-es-baskaninin-dokunulmazligi-kaldirilarak-bariscil-aciklama-ve-
 Judges of Peace make decisions for search, seizure and detention on abstract   eylemleri-sebebiyle-siyasi-amaclarla-tutuklanmasi-sozlesme/
 grounds. Decisions are made to search, seize and detain our colleagues who
 spend most of their profession in the courthouse. The homes of our colleagues   12.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/24-nisan-buyuk-felaket-ermeni-halkinin-
                acisini-paylasiyoruz
 are  raided  and  searched,  as  well  as  their  offices  and  their  information  and
 documents, which are part of their professional activities, are sized. Cell phones   13.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/kurdistan-ifadesini-cezalandirmak-utanctir-
                kabul-edilemez
 and computers, which have become an indispensable tool of our profession,
 are seized without copying their memories. In this way, the Professional activities   14.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/hakkari-raporu-kamuoyuyla-paylasildi
 of our colleagues are prevented by the judiciary itself.  15.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/1915
            16.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/diyanet-isleri-baskaninin-nefret-soylemi-
                hakkinda-basin-aciklamamiz
 The attorneyship profession, which is one of the cornerstones of the principle of   17.  https://t24.com.tr/haber/diyarbakir-barosu-yoneticilerine-de-diyanet-sorusturmasi,875438
 judicial independence, which is an indispensable part of the rule of law, should be
 exercised independently, fairly and freely. It should not be forgotten that lawyers who   18.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/soykirim-magdurlarini-saygiyla-aniyoruz
 are the guarantee of independent defense; it is the guarantee of all citizens’ access   19.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/diyarbakir-barosu-baskani-av-cihan-aydina-
 to justice, fair trial, right and justice. Attacking lawyers means attacking democratic   ve-meslektaslarimiza-yonelik-saldiriyi-kiniyoruz
 values. Diyarbakır Bar Association and its members will continue to protect and defend   20.  https://www.diyarbakirbarosu.org.tr/haberler/savasa-hayir-baris-hemen-simdi
 fundamental rights and freedoms against all kinds of oppression and unlawfulness.   21.  21https://www.birgun.net/haber/adalet-bakani-gul-yargi-birilerinin-dedigine-bakmaz-
                anayasa-ya-bakar-322654
            22.  https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_sald%C4%B1r%C4%B1s%C4%B1
            23.  https://www.turkhukuksitesi.com/mevzuat.php?mid=5930
            24.  http://www.ihop.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/OHALdurumraporu_31122017.
                pdf














 14                                        15
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42