Page 35 - 2020 Yılında Diyarbakır Barosu Başkanı, Yönetim Kurulu ve Baro Üyesi Avukatlara Yönelik Soruşturma ve Kovuşturmalara Dair Rapor
P. 35

DIYARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATIONARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATION
 DIYARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATIONARBAKIR BAR ASSOCIATION  DIY
 DIY
 LAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTERAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTER  L LAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTERAWYERS’ RIGHTS CENTER
 L
 houses do not have ventilation which open to the outside and our colleagues stated
 that the hygiene rules that should be taken due to the pandemic, were not taken and
 that there were many people in the same place. Two colleagues who were detained,   Conclusions And Determinations
 tested positive for Covid, a few days after they were released.   1.  The President of our Bar Association Tahir Elçi, was killed just after he made a
                statement in front of the Dört Ayaklı Minare ( Four Legged Minaret) in Suriçi on
 During  their  detention,  the  forensic  examinations  of  our  colleagues  were  not   28 November 2015. In the investigation initiated after the murder of Tahir Elçi,
 conducted  at  the  hospital,  they  were  examined  by  the  doctor  who  brought  to   many ordinary investigative procedures  were either not carried out or carried
 the  Police  Department  and  the  doctor  examined  our  colleagues  in  the  attorney   out incompletely. We would like to state that we are worried that the same
 consultation room.   attitude will also be experienced during the trial phase. In crimes involving public
 During their detention, the forensic examinations of our colleagues were not conducted at the
 Our Colleagues Who Were Investigated and Prosecuted in 2020  officials,  it  is  observed  that  the  judicial  and  administrative  authorities  behave
 hospital, they were examined by the doctor who brought to the Police Department and the
 doctor examined our colleagues in the attorney consultation room.    arbitrarily in conducting investigations and display a reluctant attitude to carry
 The institutional activities of the Diyarbakır Bar Association are systematically subject to

                Our Colleagues Who Were Investigated and Prosecuted in 2020
 investigation and prosecution. At least 78 investigations and criminal cases were filed   out investigations in accordance with the law. This attitude, which corresponds

 against at least 69 colleagues of our Bar Association in 2020, due to their corporate   exactly to ‘the policy of impunity’ , was also encountered in the murder of Tahir
 The institutional activities of the Diyarbakır Bar Association are systematically subject to
 and professional activities, together with the President of the Bar Association  and the   Elçi.  Diyarbakır  Bar  Association  emphasizes  the  state  of  law  and  calls  fort  he
 investigation and prosecution. At least 78 investigations and criminal cases were filed against
 at least 69 colleagues of our Bar Association in 2020, due to their corporate and professional
 members of the Board of Directors who served between 2016- 2020.  abandonment of the policy impunity and the revealing of Tahir Elçi’s murder in
 activities, together with the President of the Bar Association  and the members of the Board of
                all its aspects.
 Directors who served between 2016- 2020.
            2.  Thousands of civil servants were dismissed as a result of the state of emergency
                declared after the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 and the decree laws published
                on various dates, press media, associations, foundations and trade unions have
                been closed (24). This public attitude towards non- governmental organizations,
                which are indispensable elements of democratic order and pluralism, continues
                with different methods after the end of the state of emergency. Membership of
                our colleagues, who were members of associations that were closed down by
                decree laws during the state of emergency, are included in the investigation
                and case files as evidence within the scope of the allegation of ‘membership in
                a terrorist organization’.
            3.  The  Diyarbakır  Bar  Association  is  aware  of  the  threats  and  dangers  against
                fundamental rights and freedoms in our country, especially the peaceful solution
                of the Kurdish issue and strives to effectively investigate these violations and to

 1)  In the investigation phase   bring  the  perpetrators  to  justice  and  to  be  fairly  investigated  and  punished.
 2)  In the prosecution phase
     3)  Decision not to prosecute   Diyarbakır  Bar  Association  is  systematically  subjected  to  pressure,  threats  and
 4)  Acquittal decision
 1.  In the investigation phase  judicial harassment due to this struggle for rights carried out institutionally and
 5)  Imprisonment   with the individual support and efforts of its members.
 6)  Unknowns
 2.  In the prosecution phase
            4.  We would like to inform you that the ‘systematic’ investigation and prosecution
 3.  Decision not to prosecute  of  the  Diyarbakır Bar  Association’s statements and  other  institutional  activities

 The stages of 78 ongoing investigations and prosecutions against at least 68 colleagues
 4.  Acquittal decision  poses  a  serious  threat  to  the  elected  President  of  the  Bar  Association  and
 who are members of the Diyarbakır Bar Association and due to their professional
 activities are as follows;
 5.  Imprisonment  Board Members regarding freedom of expression. The broad and ambiguous

 -  59 % are under investigation.
 6.  Unknowns   expressions  in  Article  301  of  the  Turkish  Penal  Code  create  a  wide  scope  of
 -  23 % are under prosecution.   application  outside  of  prosecutors  and  courts  and  create  results  contrary  to
 -  1 % are decision of non- prosecutions.   the ‘predictability’ criteria of the crime in Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.
 -  5 % are acquittal decision.
 The  stages  of  78  ongoing  investigations  and  prosecutions  against  at  least  68   Therefore, the decision which subject to objection should be removed.
 -  3 % are imprisonment.
 -  9 % did not want to give information.
 colleagues  who  are  members  of  the  Diyarbakır  Bar  Association  and  due  to  their   5.  The  judicial  attitude  towards  eliminating  personal  and  institutional  freedom

 professional activities are as follows;   of expression has increasingly turned into a tool of pressure. The ‘freedom of

                expression criteria’ in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights are
 •   59 % are under investigation.  13
                mostly not taken into account by the courts of instance.
 •   23 % are under prosecution.
            6.  The crime of ‘membership in an organization’ regulated in Article 314 of the
 •   1 % are decision of non- prosecutions.  Turkish Penal Code is widely interpreted by the courts. The social media posts
 •   5 % are acquittal decision.  of  our  colleagues  (citizens,  of  course)  over  the  years,  professional  activities,
 •   3 % are imprisonment.  membership  of  the  association  closed  by  a  decree  law,  peaceful  meetings
                and demonstrations which they attended, abstract expressions of anonymous
 •   9 % did not want to give information.
                witnesses and investigation and criminal cases are filed against them on charges
 12                                        13
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40